In the intricate interplay of visual arts, typography serves as a subtle but powerful tool to reflect and create identities. Due to the frequently changing nature of language and intense interaction between people and writing, typefaces can be classified as one of the indicators of identities in personal, cultural, national, or political contexts. Typography also has a close relationship with historical events because the political and ideological reflection of typography is mainly determined by its historical and traditional development, and this connection enables typographic elements like typefaces to transmit the historical fragments embedded in the visual appearance of glyphs (Morison in Billard 6). Although typography is one of the out-of-sight components among visual materials, typefaces are not only vital tools for expressing existing identities, such as personal, cultural, national, and political, but also versatile instruments for constructing an identity; typographic choices like anatomy and stroke form of the letters have a profound effect on perceptions and portrayals of identity by conveying fragments that belong to a specific group.
The Power of Type: Constructing Identity Through Typography
How typography shapes identity, influencing cultural and national perceptions.
Works Cited
Bil’ak, Peter. “A View of Latin Typography in Relationship to the World.” Typotheque, 3 May 2008, https://www.typotheque.com/articles/a-view-of-latin-typography-in-relationship-to-the-world.
Billard, Thomas. “Fonts of Potential: Areas for Typographic Research in Political Communication.” International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, Sept. 2016, pp. 4570–92.
Bringhurst, Robert. The Elements of Typographic Style. 3rd ed, Hartley & Marks, Publishers, 2004.
Campbell, Kurt. “The Sociogenic Imperative of Typography: A ‘Face’ for the New South Africa.” European Journal of English Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, Apr. 2013, pp. 72–91. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2013.755002.
Haenschen, Katherine, and Daniel J. Tamul. “What’s in a Font?: Ideological Perceptions of Typography.” Communication Studies, vol. 71, no. 2, Mar. 2020, pp. 244–61. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1692884.
Heller, Steven, and A. M. Cassandre. “The Meanings of Type.” Eye Magazine, https://www.eyemagazine.com/feature/article/the-meanings-of-type. Accessed 24 Mar. 2024.
Heller, Steven, and Philip B. Meggs, editors. Texts on Type: Critical Writings on Typography. Allworth Press, 2001.
Hersh, Ben. “How Fonts Are Fueling the Culture Wars | Backchannel.” Wired. www.wired.com, https://www.wired.com/2017/05/how-fonts-are-fueling-the-culture-wars/. Accessed 20 Mar. 2024.
Lupton, Ellen. Thinking with Type: A Critical Guide for Designers, Writers, Editors, & Students. 2nd rev. and Expanded ed, Princeton Architectural Press, 2010.
Pichler, Klaus. “Тhe Dark Lord of Logos.” Vice, 7 Nov. 2008, https://www.vice.com/en/article/exang4/dark-lord-of-logos-302-v15n11.
Rahmat, Sujud Puji Nur, et al. “Typological Analysis of Metalhead Community’s Logo as Visual Communication During Covid-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Urban Society’s Arts, vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2022, pp. 33–47. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.24821/jousa.v9i1.7073.
Reichsorganisationsleiter der NSDAP, Organisationsbuch der NSDAP., Munchen, 1937, The Military Press.
Rijken, Gerrit J., et al. Illegible Semantics: Exploring the Design Space of Metal Logos. 2021. DOI.org (Datacite), https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2109.01688.
Spiekermann, Erik, and E. M. Ginger. Stop Stealing Sheep & Find out How Type Works. 2nd ed, Adobe Press, 2003.
Waldeck, Mila. “Typography and Nationalism: The Past and Modernism under Nazi Rule.” Journal of Visual Political Communication, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2018, pp. 37–80. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1386/jvpc_00003_1.
Yıldırım, Alper. Typography and Ideology: Typeface Design as a Statement. Bilkent University, 2012, http://hdl.handle.net/11693/15565.